Log in
or
Join
.
Web
|
Video
|
Texts
|
Audio
|
Projects
|
About
|
Account
|
TVNews
About TV
Help
Feedback
Sort:
Relevance
Most Recent
Oldest
More search options
Search just the current recording:
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
Network:
Station:
Program Title:
Language:
Chinese
English
Esperanto
Filipino
French
Hebrew
Korean
Spanish
Date Range:
From:
To:
BORROW
BROADCAST SUMMARY
SHARE CLIP
Simply click and copy the url below to share this clip:
SFGTV SITE
00:00
If you
log in
or
join us
, you could
Add a Comment
Cancel
00:00
0
said:
BORROW
copyrighted work
SFGTV
December 4, 2012 6:30am-7:00am PST on
SFGTV
0 comments
Clips viewed 21 times
Extracted Topics
borden
3
us
3
mr. wyco
2
mr. rodgers
1
wiener
1
antonini
1
wu
1
amy rodgers
1
elaine warren
1
ms. rodgers
1
ann marie
1
bifurcating
1
mta
1
recertify
1
cetera
1
sugaya
1
state c-e-q-a law
1
ms. hester
1
Broadcast Summary
00:00
looking
people
better
process
website
transparent
et
yes
hit
apply
saved
staff
front
cetera
appeal
houses
change
button
making
provide
everyone
outlined
involved
something
appellate
arguments
properties
information
00:30
basically
scheduling
commission
last
legislation
permutations
recommendations
went
point
trade
speak
bit
wants
plans
level
little
things
people
call
detail
asking
policy
couple
provide
onerous
acre
clarify
applies
whoever
planning
happened
versions
five
including
deadlines
provision
01:00
notice
gets
renters
includes
participated
participation
mail
kind
left
years
every
saying
number
single
parcel
whoever
process
knowing
sending
parcels
planning
occupied
returned
superior
contacted
everybody
undelivered
01:30
property
notice
zoned
maybe
rezoned
nonconforming
rh1
right
owner
legal
trade
saying
choose
become
general
concern
whatever
district
actually
anything
different
effective
acceptance
residential
02:00
terms
points
entirety
separate
recycling
discretionary
ball
easy
main
slip
hides
guess
plays
peril
games
people
fairly
notice
cracks
inform
action
process
somehow
affects
someone
project
directly
02:30
arguing
project
understood
legislation
piecemealing
discretionary
wasn
city
stay
lose
court
legal
terms
piece
agree
number
giving
review
change
entire
action
process
speaker
metionv
speakers
standard
authority
03:00
permits
planning
building
commissioner
department
discretionary
mr
gets
sort
wyco
thank
house
sorry
might
areas
thing
borden
prefer
notice
around
mostly
permit
action
dealing
happens
someone
revolve
changes
antonini
question
questions
situations
03:30
ex
cad
limit
number
notice
environmental
law
six
need
type
right
guess
state
month
almost
appeal
hearing
process
article
counter
project
anything
existing
statutory
provisions
requirement
04:00
whether
structured
supervisor
contractor
unrealistic
supplemental
six
deal
need
many
heard
almost
within
little
notice
trying
begins
rights
months
happens
notices
website
posting
project
sponsor
projects
exercise
approved
something
instances
basically
04:30
appeal
done
something
sometimes
realistic
increasing
20
mind
pops
long
days
mean
month
heard
short
range
spoken
period
sudden
window
perhaps
nothing
noticing
starting
05:00
things
notice
someplace
happening
commission
necessarily
web
may
fine
mail
sort
print
might
place
people
public
easily
owners
making
visible
noticed
sending
without
looking
examiner
planning
possible
property
websites
available
universal
05:30
things
hearing
comments
legislation
thinking
abridging
ms
lot
fine
part
kind
staff
needs
thank
wrong
thing
dealt
nobody
little
tuning
rights
public
correct
rodgers
everyone
06:00
almost
appeal
always
process
involve
modifications
rs
cad
same
board
issue
exists
public
couple
regards
believe
followed
negative
projects
normally
sometimes
decisions
particularly
declarations
06:30
re
action
appeal
project
already
mandatory
efficient
heard
approved
mean
evening
part
expect
makes
approve
amy
approval
couple
order
sense
07:00
appeal
staff
combine
similar
everything
presentations
done
call
last
once
board
items
chosen
things
public
listed
called
comment
correct
rodgers
project
planning
combined
actually
although
approval
projects
covering
together
separately
07:30
rather
oftentimes
everybody
bifurcating
opportunity
environmental
end
309
may
yeah
done
next
goes
sense
means
filed
cases
piece
makes
almost
appeal
always
hearing
delayed
whatever
comments
separate
hearings
08:00
lot
part
months
generally
legislation
substantial
law
isn
fair
move
deal
state
issue
whole
noted
saying
voiced
really
things
points
changed
process
tonight
forward
nothing
argument
mistaken
evidence
approval
different
08:30
body
appeals
projects
appellate
commission
particular
1st
hit
law
long
head
part
nail
2003
many
went
flood
state
county
really
enough
effect
entire
process
elected
nothing
january
speakers
happened
09:00
piece
appeal
majority
legislation
supervisors
environmental
309
need
part
needs
board
fruit
every
super
lower
using
simple
county
hanging
project
examined
actually
override
approval
accepted
attractive
09:30
huge
something
commission
lot
challenging
devastating
comprehensive
law
why
bar
much
that
kind
years
state
filed
super
fewer
people
little
couple
during
always
appeals
picking
mystery
accurate
majority
probably
adequate
document
complete
10:00
project
corollary
technical
supervisor
identified
environmental
lot
vote
able
many
start
parts
today
times
dealt
wiener
issues
rather
things
behind
appeal
process
pointed
speaker
opposed
problems
10:30
much
period
appeal
concerns
attention
supervisor
30
firm
days
moves
borden
really
things
public
notice
paying
brought
towards
whether
definite
expected
possible
11:00
appeal
sometimes
statutory
commission
situations
supervisors
see
six
stop
hear
years
beale
seems
board
period
manner
rather
things
timely
months
nothing
appeals
dragged
planning
multiple
although
11:30
legislation
definitely
admonitions
lack
supervisors
commissioner
commissioners
days
hear
hold
tall
moved
thank
board
every
piece
order
spoken
topics
talked
couple
already
process
wu
forward
meetings
community
something
struggles
potential
lot
department
especially
suggesting
12:00
feel
encourage
supervisor
reasonable
emotionses
declarations
30
bit
case
days
sets
frame
clear
little
wouldn
appeals
process
setting
offices
question
negative
probably
outreach
reaction
12:30
notice
ask
situation
clarifying
legislation
supervisors
mr
six
wasn
sort
case
land
mean
board
people
appeal
wanted
months
revert
either
decider
rodgers
whatever
decision
currently
questions
committee
13:00
board
full
hear
approval
typically
recommendation
planning
needs
entitlement
land
hearing
committee
goes
public
different
case
entitlements
today
13:30
board
committee
full
public
comment
typically
hear
appeals
sitting
procedures
choose
level
decision
sits
believe
whole
happen
14:00
board
today
decide
future
exemption
disdifference
set
deck
full
bear
thank
seems
derek
might
whole
appeal
wanted
either
another
speaker
neglect
proposed
standing
questions
important
highlight
understood
distinction
14:30
laws
negative
declaration
provisions
clarification
environmental
ask
wyco
bill
state
maybe
clear
place
object
process
general
country
standing
objected
broadest
appealed
exemption
15:00
standing
represent
establishes
understood
procedural
irrespective
due
door
next
terms
raise
people
states
united
things
appeal
normal
letter
rights
always
process
spelled
reality
speaker
exercise
affected
thousand
objection
generally
consistent
15:30
kind
raise
standing
objection
essentially
particularly
isn
show
need
city
last
hour
issue
maybe
really
better
appeal
rights
process
address
attorney
exercise
something
winnowing
16:00
hour
exemption
last
mean
categorical
declaration
ah
case
right
apply
again
haven
clear
leave
appeal
making
depends
whether
example
question
negative
situation
identical
commented
16:30
appeal
wish
days
document
extensively
subsequently
20
30
hear
face
raise
state
board
within
agency
chooses
publish
someone
however
planner
contact
concerns
affected
involved
potential
calendared
17:00
action
board
appeal
commission
directly
legislation
planning
ignore
commissioner
triggering
permit
thank
days
associated
wait
20
permitting
entitlement
okay
sugaya
17:30
respect
marie
questions
ann
responding
thanks
disjointed
table
additional
bunch
information
thank
asked
comments
terms
18:00
looking
timelines
providing
previously
exemptions
declarations
rs
ann
fine
many
staff
marie
thank
asked
number
matrix
letters
quickly
negative
questions
documents
responses
submitted
18:30
appeals
2010
years
three
number
department
rs
15
16
18
six
far
2011
five
last
pick
left
total
chose
month
eight
within
compare
december
whatever
processed
19:00
exemptions
three
context
every
rs
thousand
process
appealed
2011
10
thousands
people
exemptionses
years
various
ago
19:30
high
seem
kind
number
supervisors
departments
rec
qua
mta
huge
park
bear
guess
based
seems
board
abuse
maybe
cetera
sounds
reform
forsee
process
correct
problem
argument
building
requests
department
processing
conceivably
20:00
questions
perfectly
exemption
exemptions
declaration
notificationses
lot
fine
dick
kind
fact
issue
clear
times
thing
issues
attack
public
trying
process
despite
working
details
clarify
neglect
negative
majority
20:30
ms
might
hester
declaration
neighborhood
organizations
and
may
bit
move
open
forth
haven
areas
clear
people
aspect
little
reform
brought
talking
support
looking
thought
negative
supervisor
additional
completely
21:00
process
question
original
jurisdiction
whatever
ideas
borden
incorporated
additional
commissioners
respect
zoning
automatically
supervisor
board
issues
mentioned
supervisors
terms
reform
started
21:30
board
supervisors
saying
commission
wyco
body
understand
language
legislation
isn
certification
wording
certify
certifies
final
bill
22:00
case
board
appeal
legislation
actually
action
technically
matter
there
consideration
commenter
acting
before
something
legally
affirmed
recertify
certify
either
22:30
isn
board
document
supervisors
certification
automatically
goes
body
else
uses
least
adopt
whole
really
appeal
action
concept
correct
earlier
applies
findings
whatever
measures
appealed
unchanged
presented
discussed
understood
mitigation
legislative
legislation
23:00
board
process
referring
ordinance
commission
certification
yes
let
act
city
same
bill
cases
deputy
anyway
warren
before
elaine
certify
actions
projerk
written
earlier
approve
project
attorney
planning
document
requires
explained
23:30
board
appeal
project
supervisor
essentially
certification
body
gets
hears
taken
gives
wiener
affirm
action
affirms
certify
exactly
approve
assuming
approves
document
required
explained
automatic
24:00
project
approve
together
explained
processes
commission
ann
law
state
issue
along
marie
asked
people
normal
decide
affirm
action
related
claimed
consider
planning
decision
whatever
approval
24:30
body
making
final
getting
decision
document
law
state
put
hard
done
sure
case
gets
fact
shape
record
skirts
planning
appealed
required
together
commission
legislative
certification
25:00
body
board
instances
certifying
commission
appreciate
may
isn
mean
seems
final
saying
people
system
bypass
easier
wouldn
making
current
forcing
thinking
decision
together
25:30
appeal
yes
filing
hearing
precluded
prepare
supervisors
let
present
certification
board
changes
okay
instead
document
process
actual
kind
26:00
permit
triggering
discussions
understands
specifically
departmental
lot
site
lots
firm
owner
needs
means
saying
nobody
levels
action
actions
working
various
example
building
property
discussion
26:30
building
site
department
information
intricacies
understanding
mr
lot
goes
wyco
part
issue
terms
forth
issued
policy
actual
permit
action
provide
speaker
whatever
planning
familiar
understood
triggering
27:00
permit
flat
whatever
dirty
document
invited
reliable
cover
recycling
process
mean
conceptual
environmental
laundry
okay
problem
staff
27:30
staff
firsthand
processes
shortening
department
especially
20
isn
gone
gets
days
falls
apart
thing
whole
quoted
certain
somebody
approval
projects
building
reliable
apologize
knowledge
28:00
appeal
especially
documents
understand
substantial
information
20
shot
base
given
takes
since
three
basic
weeks
issue
place
obtain
period
trying
entire
records
request
evidence
examples
answered
building
28:30
fair
means
public
argument
evidence
substantial
however
guys
clearer
law
ordinance
much
state
whatever
read
put
lawyers
forth
supervisor
oh
leave
29:00
evidence
substantial
low
people
threshold
problem
conjunction
conjure
excluding
need
word
mean
argument
fair
fact
reading
necessarily
provide
phrase
29:30
wants
phrases
written
state
address
much
something
maybe
supervisor
law
commission
needs
terms
Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)